Monday, May 15, 2017

"God In Our World Becomes Destruction Of Its Reality."

  1. Sol Y Air Be Caedo CE - edited poem.
    Twyll The ChyllTyrant - circa 2005
  2. Our holes are big enough as they are. But if we know, we'll shoot too far. Joking? ...That missing point, we tried so hard to leave out. Two big hearts leading back to some atom. On every journey end begins the dawn of another failure. Forget his best, our wounds were open.
  3. All dedicated to mistakes that jump out of paintings on walls. The low gun, less important than a silhouette. The masquerade of games, until the sun falls and the air blows gone. Ants under an elephant's shade, and blades in the tears of heroes. Forgetting fears, return eight years to homes. The wolves of excuses, bled shadows slow.
    So who was? The world dries the paint. When it comes to the point, however, is not when we are the same, but the portal, as they say.
    Look in the highest shallows sometime and wonder loud to the bright side of the moon. Never repeating what it took lifetimes to defeat.
  4. The stars are the angles of how that funny old man up there, fishing pole and all, never slept with his eyes closed, only angels' shimmer, swimming wishes. They are his way to keep days and nights rolling on, one at a time, to then from now. Answers lost forever, question always what kept the sky from writing a name, or getting it alright.
  5. Well, another quote to use here is "Maybe we'll all be saved". Faith to the future, my friend. False as it may seem. Truth to the crying, for a face may never see. Not on a liar screen, nor in the lair screams.
    Nothing behind, that made me so much more than where I dream.

Addendum to Sol Y Air Be Caedo CE










peece





















ADDENDUM



to Sol Y Air Be CAEDO CE



























































1

by Twyll the ChyllTyrant

bka Willard Tyler Moulton

my father, the original saint saith unto thee...

be bright, actions speak louder than words

my son, tracked by hell’s angels

the world, no signature as deep

will, the disappearing lights, be

a search begun





























EndGame





what is the answer to every question?

why is there a question?

what is the question?



why is what an answer?

what is the answer of why?

why not?



what is why?

what made it?



is it to be?

is it not?





bonus:



is how, who you are?

is when, where i am?





extra credit:

what came first, the chicken or the egg?





authority or religion?



Quick Joke



what’s the worst butt of every joke?

i can’t say i’d remember it...

something like eyes don’t smoke



nah i think it just what was the worst butt?

dude something like snakes...

ok, ok.

yo lemme try a’gain



yes sir...

how ever beautiful her land?

for that long flag to stand?

i’m the dutiful one man band

and tried to understand...



































The Fear

One day, a new girl is brought into the world that we ourselves have grown into.  It is, as always, a learning experience, and every day the girl discovers aspects of her surroundings that are bright and new.  The closer she stays to her parents, the better and more protected her upbringing is, and the further she strays, the more dangers arise.  For a while, all of the people she is introduced to are other infants, with as much in common in the way of knowledge acquirement as expectable, and other mothers and fathers whose purposes are the same, to shelter.



Then, as time continues on in the perpetual motion that we all have come to understand or at least adhere to, the young girl learns that things that are outside of her are different.  She begins to understand that the physical makeup of all of her contemporaries are remarkable and foreign.  This is when she begins to question, “Who am I?”



The basis of the idea that fear is an inescapable human emotion is that everybody, even the most fearless of heroes, has an underlying web of emotions that control their behavior.  The admission, though, that emotion is a reaction to environment is one that convolutes the situation further, except if you look at the very fact that fear is an emotion based on pain rather than happiness.  This alone, limits the amount of fear which should logically pass through ones emotional spectrum.



Back to the girl, whose teenage years are spent spellbound by the gnawing question.  “Who am I?”  The only consolation to the constant confusion is that she can tell apart the things in life that which she is not.  In this way, she distances herself from things that bring pain.  If the society she claims, for instance, publicizes that chicken skin causes fat, and that being fat will deter boyfriends, and that without a boyfriend she may be alone, or at the worst scenario “homeless”, she might stop eating chicken skin.  There is no limit to the possibilities that could cause fear for her, and she isn’t going to stop her inner analyzation process for anything.  She can’t, because it is impossible.



The process is simple, if something causes pain once, it is immediately turned into a cognitive no-no.  If broad assumptions are made to new or foreign pieces of reality, than they will be made without second thought.  A new girl at school becomes fodder for the aristocracy of the inherent structure.



No demons propel us towards our nature as emotional beings, only memories of what causes pain and happiness.



The importance of this comes into play in the late 20th century.  Here, where we have World Wars, immigration laws, and terrorism, all as secondary pieces of everyday life, the memories become so fastpaced that often much is forgotten about the individual.  Good or bad?



In an age where internet keeps us connected more than any other tool of communication, besides direct confrontation, “what is the exact point of emphasis on individuality?”  we wonder.  Diversity having been forced on us through education and general exposure to the world around us, along with acceptance for every one of our fellow citizens, we find ourselves actually losing the individuality that seemed so important to the people behind the system.  Instead, what we find is a numbed down culture, especially in America where violence on television and movies is scoffed at rather than being taken seriously, as a relative point of reference for the amount of violence and vulgarity that we actually had to have possessed internally to create such forms of entertainment in the first place.



This isn’t about entertainment, but it is, and as the girl grows older, she finds herself losing motivation to the spinning torrent of a constantly changing world.  There were simpler times in human development, when a hunter’s catch was the making of a good day.  Now, a trip to the grocery store with 100 dollars worth of purchases only leads to more tv dinners being eaten in front of a tv.  Is it any surprise, that the young girl turned to drugs in our interim?  That she lost her virginity young, but went without bearing offspring for such a long time?



Meanwhile, as the world becomes more and more solitarily designed for the individual’s complacency, the things that keep us who we are gain personal levity.  Religion becomes a person’s entire life, and not just that they go to church and pray everyday, but that they feel as though the religion is itself, theirs.  The politicians become vendetta charged, with only a few platforms that they promise will become their sole missions.  Even those who intermingle with the disattached, the drug induced, the hermits and outcasts of society, get the feeling in their bones that they are living a purpose.  The problem is, that we don’t live a purpose, or one, but many.  Multi tasking in the recent years, for instance has risen in the general populations’ abilities.  Isn’t this a way to do fewer things, only once, and let the reciprocation take effect naturally?



The world becomes charged with these emotions, of fear of being outdone, of fear of being left out, of not being themselves perpetually, and strange things begin to happen.  Terrorists, who feed off of the other’s fears of these things, but indeed suffer greater of the same inflictions, begin to congregate.



Our young woman dies in the World Trade Centers.  Her family purchases a ribbon.  A cousin joins the army a couple of years later out of financial reasons, and life will move on.



But until when?



The human body itself, a conglomeration of different ingredients has been under attack by foreign minerals and constituents of the spread of different mixtures.  The body passes these ingredients down, generation to generation.  We are now at a boiling point with carcinogens and pollutants.  As is the environment around us losing to the wastefulness of humanity, as are our individual bodies.



What happens next is anyone’s guess, and it has been for quite some time.  But if you have ever played a guessing game, you know that enough hints will lead you to the right answer evantually.



The silent weapons that attack us are more than meet the eye even at the political level.  We are just fulfilling the fantasies set out by ancient peoples, by the industrial revolution, and by current fundamentalists.  War isn’t around the corner, people, it’s already at place.  Armageddon was in the 2000’s.



Fear in totality, is something that we can’t try to fight or hide.  But individuality may just be covering our fears, and that is something that I’m afraid will have to be changed.  Acceptance, and complacency versus war and terror.  The war doesn’t have to be fought, but it will be waged in our own minds.



































0 +

fy = ∞



46264

3:141592653589

79323846264338327

95028841971693993

7510

(1)

3:1415926535897932384626433832795

0288419716939937510

+

2(1.00000000000000000000)

3.14159265358979323846

x65358979323846yce

+

U

+

y = g = d = be = x = cddd = fx

                    a

ii = x + ae = ce = 2

dddd      d

-

                                                   h   =   abe   == x + ae =  tyrc

tyrc = dddd    =    ashes  = 1 = f

+

fy = ∞

+

A

O-O

OcO

O+O

O-iO

O+O

Or-rO

=

0.1  ... 1.0

+E+

~tyrc

(i0i)

i0.0i

tysim

Addendum to Sol Y Air Be Caedo CE

The Infinite Soul Stops The Heir And Their Fall To Reality

Twyll The ChyllTyrant (Poet)

Willard Tyler Moulton (Philosopher)

to be attended by Wali and Friends and Souls of Greater Value and Virtuous Foolery, Utilitarian Universalism, my World, Poets, etc.



Bob McDonald had a farm

1        sun was New Jerusalem away

2        Jupiter’s Way

to a sofa on saturn sits an egg hatched on a seat of Uranus, Neptune’s just pissed for the first dog and me!







Three cherubs will be disguised as hogs of ugliness at the gate of heaven.

Just ignore them as that.

They will want to know Death’s name.

Just tell them it’s too beautiful to mention here.

You’ll get in, but you’ll always wonder where the other half of your ticket went.







Some journeys...  Let me tell ya.



























































The Secret

To understand the secret one must first understand the inner urge to trust one’s own instincts.  These instinctive travels of man as recorded by history are a testament of a guideline set up by a higher intelligence.  That every man has lived by his own guidelines is basic to the fact that you have to be able to trust yourself for the secret of telepathy to work.  Trust is the foundation of survival, for without trust in one’s self, selfish and pious become faithless and unsalvagable.



Next, one must understand that although the receptive article may appear to fulfill the requirements of telepathic behavior, they can only be brought to the surface of expressive telepathic imitation through unblocked trust, barrierless love, and purely positive thought process.  True faith in the words of one’s mouth and actions of one’s hand are what positively communicate telepathy with the outter environments of the universe.



The more difficult stages of the argument for telepathy stem from the depth of language aside it’s counterpart of time.  Concentration of a particular phrase and nostalgia of an experience may create friction in time where the recreation of the experience may never again occur.  However, language, is as much a part of internal thought as it is with external conversation.  If anyone can catch hint of your wariness of a particular experience, they may be caused to react with negative skepticism which may in turn make the event happen.  The lingual karma of speach is not limited to only the power of verbal communication, but as well, bodily expression, of course, only convuluting the matter that much more.



Physical reality, in this way, is the intercept of time and lingual action.  However, it too has attached to it the mental spectrum, which acts as a balance of all physical conditions with an attached range of reaction.  Internal thought, therefore balances physical language, which is intercepted by physical reality reflecting mental intuition. 



Simply look at internal thought as our instinctive travel through the fluctuating time continuum.  Mental emotion, as effected by mental instinct and intuition, is the regulation of speed through thoughts, which in turn effects our perception of time.  This is why the setting of complete trust between subjects is crucial to the expirementation of mental telepathy.



Conversation and physical event of structural movement are both the way we set increments to time, yet our perception may change on its own accord, due through the very instances which set pace to themselves.  Karma is the term that is used most frequently to describe the unfolding time pockets that occur outside the physical structural movements, such as internal thoughts and mental anguish or elation.



The truth of the secret lies in the balance of trust between one’s own instincts, and the ignorance of any other possible outcome other than the inevitable, which is what all must come to meet in passing.  The inevitably permanent adherence of all humans and lifeforms with thinking ability to time is what keeps usefulness of this information all distant and inobtainable.

I went to a heaven-like

place once when I was alive

I had it with her but didn’t

see her before she died.

Not even a hair

would die the film.

It was a beautiful film.

But someone washed the

lines out, disgraced it.

Mine was brighter but the screams

were wider.







Computer base of DNA for religious children in which is Woman whom controls computer and Man who controls workforce.  Offspring of whome come from men from exterior rings of generations to inferior women.  Offsprings are boys and girls who control political power such as education, judgment, and taxpaying for transportation, amongst a value of entertainment and governmental issues.

























































28841971693993751



being that the power of a repeating decimal is infinite.  and that a infinite number holds the common estimation of three.

also being that there is no impermanent estimation of an infinite object, and that time for the power of life exists in 18 states.  (also note that life is crucial to existence)





9.424 777   96   0  768  3 7 9 7  14 + 0 = πππP

is the correct number for the reduction of pi.

therefore, the decimal system of 10 is exagerated for the whole picture of P of where to end the pi formula.  wish i could remember the base formula...  but it wouldn’t be useful now.  for now we have an irrational number that stops at a point for reduction...

therefore pi is negative as well as positive.



2.8  0  90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90  O

is the correct number for the usage of pi at c.  however, i did indeed include the notion that pi was infinite in this case, so that the c is the golden spiral.

the golden spiral is not time, for time is impermanent and yet permanent at once, with the power of 0, which is in essence double-fold.  yet at the same time increases the potential of loss in design by the multiplicative value.



the O stands for degrees along the golden spiral, for which a measurement must be made with permanent estimation, or ~.



to make better judgments in architectural design, therefore it would be imperative to analyze the use of ~ in the complete estimative area formula.



in the area formula that can be used to create a long, infinite diameter, we must use the tyrc formula.  in this case, t is the common estimation versus E of the impermanent estimation.  y of course implies the infinite value, and r the real number for c.  r exists only as an implication of i.  in that,



r = i (c      )

         a + d



this is a tough one, that i may have lost in my cluttered area of work...  it began as the c=8 example that outdoes the i in every instance of root.  if i is multiplied by c, then divided by n + a (as the algebraic tower power’s root of example; to have an infinite sum)

so you must first start with a simple imaginatory example for a negative, (downwards slope) equation.  knowing this, however, simple algebraic rules can be applied to reform the i into an r, or vice versa as i can equal the unreal example of -c.



the use of the ~ therefore imbalances the equation for usage as a derivative function, which would otherwise have the effect of reducing a c with two b’s.  the ~ is therefore the permanent execution of a solvable distance that is used in accordance with the unwittingly fresh golden spiral example.  it also magnifies, however, the need for a new character for the area, since this appears to be the loophole effect of c. 



also in regards to t, one must have already understood the notion of a common estimation to break the barrier of area.  this is an extreme example of the notion of multiple radial differences that cannot repeat.



however, the other area application could be used as well, with the use of the reductive pi.  it is just simple to know, however, that the reductive pi only works at it’s reductive value.



(((ππ - π/b)/c) – o)/((xπ – π)(xπ – π)) = a : 69



this could be the misunderstanding to the ratio, but nonetheless, the original equation will at least get us 1% closer to a full area!



in this case, the o which was used before will need to be analyzed under the spectrum of the A theory of the quantifiable area.  this would lead to some amazement as the fact that the area appears to be one of the equation, yet is indeed a complex 1.

this is where common usage of mapping out an idea of a design would be implicated for further use in architectural design.



with quick marksmanship however, it can be seen that the 69 is not so wrong as it would seem.  it only implies that a ratial value is used to bring a 3 dimensional area into face with atomic mass.  note however that the ratio of a negative and positive (little brother) golden spiral emerge as a quandary of modern mathematics.



I emerge triumphant in finding pi, but helpless at this point to understand the next step...







π Calculations



π = 2.80909090909Oxzv + fi

x = 4

r = bb/cbb

xπ - π = v

(ccππ - π)/dcc = C

((ππ - π/b)/c) - o/vv = a : 69

~b + ~b = A

tyrc













EQUATION SECTION III:

power tower quad-collapse algebra and looped algebraic applied quantum physics with total proof answer key of A/2(18) – 1 in i + i



formed equation

Q1  Q2 + dr=f(t) + cddd ∞ ybe + tyrce = A + ax15 + 1.0 + 0Q = i + i  ==

ezx                            a                                  2       2

15 + [13(13) EQ1][13(13) = EQ1]                 

Q1 = 1 + 1 = a + a

Q2 = ((i + i) + I) (I + (i + i) = Q

Qbe = - element!

Qa = x + a

Qc = bb

Qd = bbbb

Qr = 16e

         8

==

y = + element = -! =

Mirror + b + y + a + (E + a)Infinity + i + i





Mirror effects in Estimation in t

t == €



i = -r^(a/(a + ye))

^ = power of

E = F(Q) = i ==

   F(r + x)(r + x) = t

   F(r + x)^((r + x)(r + x)) = t

=F((r + x)(r + x))^(r + x) + ((r + x)(r + x))^(r + x) + (r + x)^((r + x)(r + x))

   = t(r + x)^((r + x) + (r + x))*

r = 1

x = 0



g = 0





bbbb = 64 = Mirror -> b = 16 = y = Infinity

= ∞! = 2! = 0

= e! = 2! = 0



c = 2 = 0





d = -04

x = -0!

f = -01

CE = G8(golden ratio)

G = -8(golden ratio)

A = 16







EQUATION SECTION II:

power tower quad-collapse algebra and looped algebraic applied quantum physics with total proof answer key of A/2(18) – 1 in i + i



formed equation





Q1  Q2 + dr=f(t) + cddd ∞ ybe + tyrce = A + ax15 + 1.0 + 0Q = i + i  ==

ezx                            a                                  2       2

15 + [13(13) EQ1][13(13) = EQ1]                 

Q1 = 1 + 1 = a + a

Q2 = ((i + i) + I) (I + (i + i) = Q

Qbe = - element!

Qa = x + a

Qc = bb

Qd = bbbb

Qr = 16e

         8

==

y = + element = -! =

Mirror + b + y + a + (E + a)Infinity + i + i





Mirror effects in Estimation in t

t == €



i = -r^(a/(a + ye))

^ = power of

E = F(Q) = i ==

   F(r + x)(r + x) = t

   F(r + x)^((r + x)(r + x)) = t

=F((r + x)(r + x))^(r + x) + ((r + x)(r + x))^(r + x) + (r + x)^((r + x)(r + x))

   = t(r + x)^((r + x) + (r + x))*

r = 1

x = 0



g = 0





bbbb = 64 = Mirror -> b = 16 = y = Infinity

= ∞! = 2! = 0

= e! = 2! = 0



c = 2 = 0



π = 2.80909090909Oxzv + fi + E(π + π)

d = -04

x = -0!

f = -01

CE = G8(golden ratio)

G = -8(golden ratio)

A = 16





Incarnate Cruithnian To Air To Land in Digital to be continued in E of d = 2π/4

Air π = (2.8090909090909 + 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716)/2 + E

H = Heliosphere

dπ = Cruithne

S = Speed

m = mass

E = Earth

O = Orbit

L = Selene

Current Longitude From Heliosphere = Air



r = 2

d = 4



L-Air = 384401 km

LD = 3476 km

LAir = 110.5871692 km



SL=SE = 1.3 sec

O MAX L = 1.082 km/s

O MIN L = .968 km/s

O ~ L = 1.022 km/s



Lm = 7.347673 x 10^30 kg + E

L trace elements

Ammonia

Methane

Carbon Dioxide





E trace elements are deduced as Hydrogen from Water.





RT -> TW 29 Ds revolution around A

H-Air = 149.6 x 10^6 km

HD = 1.392 x 10^6 km

HAir = 107.4712644 km

Hm = 1.98435 x 10^30 kg + E

Sm = 1.988435 x 10^30 kg

SL = 99.9%

~1.986446565 E10^30

X = 1.986443568 x 10-^30

~X = -2.997 E-6

d = 19.86443568



cited from Wikipedia Free Online Encyclopedia



RT -> TW





Ti and Rh with use of H20



H is absolute zero, the property of which exists only in double imaginatory power and not in tyrys of i, and oxygen as the property of c behind the hidden properties of 0 and the relative compound of the five thumbs of rule.  As well as the imaginatory expression of pH.





o = b + atomic m at highest altitude

* = bb + b atomic m of water

*o = bbb + atomic m at center of core





π Calculations



π = 2.80909090909Oxzv + fi

x = 4

r = bb/cbb

xπ - π = v

(ccππ - π)/dcc = C

((ππ - π/b)/c) - o/vv = a : 69

~b + ~b = A

tyrc





“Divine Products”





           676     220

338 = 169 =   240

           513     260



3.14159 26535 89793 23846 26433 83279 5 O

2.80909090909090909090909090909090901

Lifeline Calculations



F = ~0
1 = A

2 = B

3 = ¢

Tense, Faith

W = + = !

R = +

P = -x

T = G

AY = D

YY = 0

a = D





Travel Calculations



8 = WILL

21h/7s m y O

rotation of 3 makes 10 weeks per day

8 years make one arc

seasons are 64 per arc

sessions are measures of degrees

of 9.83538 out of 6 to 59.1228 + a + Om

degrees = 120



.8772 = a = 0

3 is mass of H2O

1 is mass of Ozone

gravity is 24 at maximum O height

maximum height is at the core of the air



C = *

    = G = 012 = 460

135”’  375’

240”

time off 1.083...



two weaks = 2007777













o = E

c = 8

d = 4

32 = a

b = 16

f = 1

bbbb = 64 = M

g = 0

y = 8

x = !



: D = $

<3 be="" p="">
D : = 0 - 9



% = E

f(i) = f(r_)

f(r_) = 2R

T = R

R = Mass

D : D = 8

bb = N



[          ]

{a-iYi-e}

64 iA = 16



A + a = b





U = 135degrees

u = ~t

93993751u = 288419716E





Tax on property and offspring with regards to government and transportation*











*to be inspected as early as attainable











A  DRAFT

               

As we all know, the afterlife has been a constant dilemna of confusion for the living on Earth.  Whether there is a Heaven or Hell, Reincarnation, or other, has been a point of disagreement since the beginning of history.  We all have our personal philosophies towards what happens after we die, and the following essay is an attempt at clarification of what life means, and how the afterlife effects it.



We, as the living components of the current of time, are in constant alludement of the tangible dimensions.  As such, we have acquired the senses of feeling, and become as a collection of memory.  There are many things that separate us from the exterior elements of the foundation of life, but none greater than us as a specified unit of manipulative acquizition.  The mental realm, then, is one that is a self-contained entity, through which we explore existence.  Existence is the retraction of the material that we are consisted of, or the cycle that returns us to the non-living.  Mentality, therefore is the collective result of maintenance of acquizition, as well as the independent force which governs the active state of life.



          Reality in which we exist, encloses us, and separates the bodies of life with bodies of non-living.  All living things, in this way, are independent and responsible for their own survival.  In many more ways, though, are we separated from each other, as different organisms.  In death, for instance, we all have the capability of dieing alone, without necessary involvement of other organisms aside from divine destiny.  If even a parasite finds it hosts life to be spent before it’s own, which not often happens, it can find new host depending on it’s own actions.  As well, in birth are we always formed piece by piece to form a singular life form.



          The one thing that seems to bind the living is the state of unconcious.  Indeed, it binds as an adhesive element to each working lifeform.  Time allows life to metamorphisize and shift through dimensional reality, and to acquire or avoid certain elements.  This means, then, that the unconcious behavior that we inherently convey to the outside is the mental makeup of the perpetual outside world with relation to us.  It also means, that as a connective tissue binds to working parts of a body, the mental unconcious such as dreaming is the working structure of death, and faith, in life.



          Conciously, on the other hand, we make decisions made of our ability to predict outcomes of memorized scenarios.  This is the contrast of unconcious behavior.  If in that we make decisions consciously and unconsciously, simultaneously, to which we are always adhering to the natural observance of internal action, then it stands that sequentially, that we are always outbalanced in our experiences from the outside world.  This is a major reason why we die, and why we are unsustainable as singular entities of life.



          To explore the afterlife, it only takes notice that, as stated before, the unconscious is our platform of death.  By dieing, we are admitting that life is no longer sustainable, and that we have expended our expanding consciousness where our life has been retracted from outside elements.  It stands to reason that as we become non-living things that no longer have the capability of expanding our consciousness, that we have left a hole in collective consciousness that by the standard of time, which is forever and eternity, must be accounted for.  The unconscious, in other words, is indeed acting in the same respect as an expanding piece of dimensional being.  Interaction between the life we’ve had, and the unconscious is so great that we can only assume that the unconscious is, and always will be, in need of the life we’ve given to it.  So when we die, the unconsious will envelop our lives and in death we become once again, the life that we already had in active time.



          The afterlife is our homebase then, in this way.  We are trapped in the flesh that we were created in for eternity.



































FINAL VERSION





         We, as the living components of the current of time, are in a constant confused contingency of the tangible dimensions.  As such, we have an acquired advertence to the senses of feeling, and do become identities of a collection of memory.  There are many things that separate us from the exterior elements of life, (ie.  living bodies outside our own, perceptions, unified faith) but none greater than us as specified units of manipulative acquisition.  The mental realm, then, is one that is a self-contained entity, through which we explore existence.  Existence is primarily the evolution and evanescence of the material that we are consisted of, or the perpetual cycle that returns us to the non-living.  Mentality, therefore is the collective result of maintenance of said acquisition, as well as the independent and internal force which governs the active state of life.

          Reality in which we exist, encloses us, and separates the bodies of life with bodies of non-living.  All living things, in this way, are independent and responsible for their own fate.  In many more ways, though, are we separated from each other, as different organisms.  In death, for instance, we all have the capability of dieing alone, without necessary involvement of alternate organisms aside from prerequisite divine destiny.  If even a parasite finds it’s host's life to be spent before it’s own, which not often happens, it can revitalize itself upon attachment to a new host depending on it’s own actions.  As well, in birth are we always formed piece by piece to form a singular life form.

          The one thing that works to bind the living is the state of unconcious.  Indeed, it binds as an adhesive element to each working lifeform.  Every lifeform, while not necessarily inclined to survival through intuitive response to conscious and active life, is at the least granted instinctive mentality.  Through this process, time allows life to metamorphisize and shift through dimensional reality, and to acquire or avoid certain elements.  This means, then, that the unconcious behavior that we inherently convey to the outside is the instinctive mental makeup of the perpetual outside world with relation to us.

          Conciously, on the other hand, we make decisions made of our ability to intuitively predict outcomes of memorized scenarios.  This is in the contrast of unconcious behavior.  If in that we make decisions, consciously and unconsciously, whether simultaneously, separately, or exclusively, with to which we are always adhering to the natural observance of internal action, then it stands that sequentially, we are always outbalanced in our experiences from the outside world.



          As an addendum, but by no means as an integrated or unified solution to the thesis above: we are bound and trapped to the life which we are born into.  The constant attachment throughout life, to our own mentality, is our established universal role to which we will forever be employed in commitment to the continuity of time.







I went to a heaven-like

place once when I was alive



I had it with her but didn’t

see her before she died.

Not even a hair



would die the film.

It was a beautiful film.

But someone washed the

lines out, disgraced it.



Mine was brighter but the screams

were wider.







Computer base of DNA for religious children in which is Woman whom controls computer and Man who controls workforce.  Offspring of whome come from men from exterior rings of generations to inferior women.  Offsprings are boys and girls who control political power such as education, judgment, and taxpaying for transportation, amongst a value of entertainment and governmental issues.

















































Bob McDonald had a farm



3        sun was New Jerusalem away

4        Jupiter’s Way



to a sofa on saturn sits an egg hatched on a seat of Uranus, Neptune’s just pissed for the first dog and me!







Three cherubs will be disguised as hogs of ugliness at the gate of heaven.



Just ignore them as that.



They will want to know Death’s name.



Just tell them it’s too beautiful to mention here.



You’ll get in, but you’ll always wonder where the other half of your ticket went.







Some journeys...  Let me tell ya.















































Conceivability Of Nothing (Coldness)



“THIS STATEMENT IS NOT KNOWN TO BE TRUE BY ANYONE”



THESIS:  Nothing is equal to in all ways everything, always, forever. 

PROBLEM:  That forever and always, everything in all ways is changing.

In time and space as we know it according to our senses and knowledge, only one of a singular exists. Only one of anything that happened at any point in time can be counted. It is impossible for two of the same exact action to occur at any given time. However, an action can then be replicated to progress its effect, infinitely.  In fact, every action known to man has multiple reactions, seemingly infinite.  An action consists of a force, or power, and of space. Here is where we need a breakdown of power and space, the most primal duality known in the universe.
Power is the ability to create or replicate behavior. Potential energy is unused power. Kinetic energy is used power. Here we see an example of the duality we will be exploring.  That everything is dual in nature, is inherent in the way that energy is spread amongst objects alone.  Everything is energetic, in this way, energy represents the power of everything.

The concept of nothing has its own separate power rules. The concept of nothing controls its power, by conducting everything else’s power. Like metal wires conduct electricity. It is also the recorder of energy. The essence of nothing is forever seeking energy, making it the ultimate tool for studying the way things were at different points in time. This is what is known as space.
There is only one of anything, therefore everything is not one. This is evident in the very nature of the language used. Anything always refers to the variable, which is only set as an X, or one of nothing, with another sum which is the consistency of the variable. If only anything is one, everything, which is multiples of anything that exist, must be more than one. Consider now, that anything is one of nothing. Nothing is what controls anything, as part of the dual nature of energy. Therefore, for anything to exist it must have made itself perceptible and to do so, there must be space to interpret it. Instead of saying that anything exists within nothing, we simply say that anything is one of nothing, or everything.

Everything is chaotic, because its set has no replicants, or the possibility for complete replicants. In other words, as stated before, anything you find can only be found once. Thus creating a plethora of different possibilities of how everything looks from different angles, through space. In this simple fashion, everything is infinitely infinite. Nobody can see the same thing at the same time.

Time is the power of nothing. We will explore this concept later, but for now we can create a working model. Take the simple question of “does time stand still?” With special instruments and electricity we can bend this equation to encompass the relevant fact that a particle of energy can move through the dimension of time. However, a particle of pure positive energy, known as physical energy or kinetic cannot even stay idle because variables are endless. Meaning, time is always changing. Time, being the constant variable, is therefore at a position to last infinitely. It is indeed, our representation of our soul, and of everything/nothing.
Everything and nothing are only words, because as of yet, no one living has been able to truly, completely, perceive either. However, that they are words in human language, conceived mathematically, they do exist. For proof, look no further than the simplification of this problem as 1 – 1 = 0. This is an example of the paradox we will be exploring.
Something is one of anything. It is the part of anything that we come to know. To come to an understanding of something, something must first be conceived. The following is how something can be conceived.
First it must have a singular point of concentrated energy. We then must sense this energy, using of course our senses in concordance with mathematics. The senses represent our soul, which is also the nothing that exists within our body. We each were born with nothing, as was all things created with nothing. Even if it is the smallest region of our body, it is still representative of nothing. Many call this area the chi, or breath. It is neither positive nor negative, and only works on the instructions given by our heart and mind.

Our heart controls the positive energy that is contained in our physical self. This energy is knowledge, and within our genetics, we contain the answers to every possible circumstance that encircles our senses. The knowledge we possess is based on our experience, or the past. The past is a timed reference that has been already recorded by senses. Knowledge, when understood deeper can also be the future. The future is an untimed nonreferential action, or one that has yet to take place in our known universe. Just because it doesn’t already exist as known, however, does not make it unknowable.
To understand nothing is to be ignorant of everything conceived. More so, it is to exist without everything. This is generally where we start at prior to our first molecule of DNA. However, even then, we have an extremely wide range of knowledge.  We were created, thus satisfying a niche in the timeline.
Everything is not one thing, but every everything is followed by an infinite amount of everything, in an infinite amount of directions, as explained before. The very center of everything is nothing (x - x = 0). In this way, anything that happens, happens only once, yet is permanent (permanently unfolding). Everything will happen, whether conceived or not, because even the inconceivable is only a reflection of the conceivable. Everything is true, yet everything’s opposite is also true.

Nothing, being time and our soul is the being of everything’s opposite. Nothing is the one trustable notion to the human mind, it is truly stable, and thus we continue to the makeup of the human mind.
The mental world is a negative one, run on electrons. It is conducted through our brain tissue with electro-transmitters and receivers. It is also conducted throughout our entire universe. Everywhere, there is electrons. Electrons hover around the nucleus, or body of every atom. If there’s an atom, there is inevitably negativity. Negativity known to atomic and human levels takes on two forms. North and South, pain and love, repellant and attractive. When you look at pain, it is an untimed reference. When you look at love, it is a timed nonreference.
The human mind is the first and second part of our eleven dimensions that we harness at any given time. We are capable, as humans, to adhere to a number of eleven dimensions, and while two of these are stable, four (heart) are moved over time. We can control up to four exterior elements at once. We never control the eleventh dimension, until we die. For another illustration of how there are eleven dimensions, refer to the Tree Of Knowledge of the Quballah. This points out that there are nine points of energy within our body, and two both within and without. Another example would be that there are actually an infinite amount of dimensions. Three of which control us at any given time, and two of these are again both within and without our body. These two most stable influences are known as life and death. Life being the mind or expansive positive external energy, and death being intrusive negative external energy. The other three are the known, the unknown, and the imagination. Another two, besides the sixteen, is inherent in the structure of time, which exists within and without our bodies. Therefore, to summarize again, there are nine different states of energy for our movement. The body itself, is controlled by the heart. The mind is controlled by an ethersphere of unknown. Time is our soul, which is dual in nature as well, leading to the eleventh dimension which will be discussed later.
Nothing is inherent in all sets, because nothing, as pointed out earlier, is the container of containers (the container itself). The nothing that we perceive is really the precise present state of the universe, and the tangible things that we perceive are really just reflections of our own imbalance. The present is nothing, because it is impermanent, and ever-changing. The dynamic time continuum, would not exist, if not for our senses, which create it.
All that is retained by our heart is instincts, only through instincts can we make a personal prediction. This is how we predict the sun’s rise, mathematic outcomes, and our own paths of life. It is easy to predict specific events that we have experience with, but only through truly knowing everything in the past is it possible to understand everything in the future. This is actually easy if you ignore specifics and take in only the full, general picture.

However, there is an infinite amount of variations of what the picture could sensibly look like. If one truth of the past becomes evident in the senses, there will inevitably be an infinite amount of directions that the past could then take. If only one of these directions is known possible in reality, then everything is inconceivable because only one truth, infinite in interpretation and direction, is possible. This is the predertimination that governs all laws of the universe.
Furthermore, if everything is inconceivable, then for the opposite to be true, nothing must be conceivable. Being that nothing is conceivable, and yet that we have yet to understand it, it leads one to think that man is only a vessel of the experiences he’s had through perceiving the outside world. This is because we can normally only see the reflection of our imbalances.
Also, it must mean that if nothing can be conceived by man, then God is only an expression of something, a metaphor for what can only be complete positivity, or truth (an expression of everything would mean that God is negative, or falsity as well). Complete positivity in reality, however, cannot exist because there is always a balance of negativity and positivity. Or to address the more pagan concept of God being complete with both negativity and positivity, then God is half man, because negativity is only the reflection of experience in reality. Therefore, God does not exist, or only as a representation of one direction. In a sense, we are all our own God, because we can all only follow one direction (the direction that our past has reflected). Because there is no chance for any other direction for ourselves, there is no freewill in the human mind, and all life shares the same fate, death.
One common misconception is that life represents the positive and death represents the negative. In fact, life represents both negative and positive as shown in our own behaviors. It is also true, then that life represents the mind, and the body. Death and any pre-birth existence of soul, then represents the neutral, or nothing. In death we control nothing, thereby allowing us to fully become one with everything. Therefore, a living utopia is inconceivable, there will always be some form of evil in every society. The closest thing that we can call a utopian society in this universe at this point in time is a graveyard.
Life was created on this planet to maintain a balance, a molecule of matter was conceived that was imbalanced in it’s ratio of electrons to protons, thereby causing it to react by attaching more matter to it’s core. Without the acquisition of more material, a living thing becomes imbalanced in structure and falls to pieces. If this is true, then life is nothing more than an attempt at acquiring balance. Through the passage of time, we have come to know that such a balance is unachievable. Furthermore, such physical balances, internally, cause external imbalance. In other words, to acquire everything physical is to leave the world with nothing at all, including ourselves. The same is true of mental acquisition. If everything becomes known to one person, the effect would be that everybody else would be left so devoid of mental structure and truth, that mass-insanity would erupt. This could also be taken to mean that the one thing that is the absolute truth could lead the discoverer to understand the infinite falsehood of every single other person, making them appear quite insane and totally unstable.
The scary thing is that you must also consider that the physical world is perceivable only as collections of physical positivity. The mental world, then is perceivable only as collections of negativity. Therefore, the discoverer of the absolute truth (being a thought) would be bombarded with such a wave of intense negative realization, that suicide would be very conceivable. If they had understanding of such an immense concept, the mental world would have ceased to exist.
Interestingly enough, however, this can actually be said to have occurred. The mark of this mass-insanity is the imprint of God on civilization. God, originally a figment of imagination, created to express positivity in an already negative framework, leads us to judge ourselves as either representations of God, or as inherently negative entities who need guidance to maintain balance and life.  This future, however, is only the reflected image of the past. Deciding our future is a game for the profoundly naive or profoundly experienced, either we say that something will happen out of ignorance that it can’t, or we say it because we have been lead to believe that it will.
In conclusion, death is as valid as life in truth. As a collective, human beings may come to the realization of absolute truth after having experienced everything there is to experience. But the only real truth of everything, is found in death.















































SIMPLE MATHEMATICS



x = yx = 0

let x equal a number and y equal a number.

if x is multiplied by y it is equal to zero.

this means that either y or x are equal to zero, or both.



a + x = ya

if a is then added to x, y becomes visible as a non zero point that maintains a. 

this means that while x was zero in the previous statement, y was merely another number, other than zero.



a + a = yb

if a is added to a, the number b is multiplied to y and the two sets are equal. 

this means y is a number similiar to one, in that it upholds it’s multiplier’s value.



bb = yc

if b is multiplied by b, it becomes the value of c.

this means that by the laws that have been already made, a multiplied by a would also have the value of a, making it have the value of a.



bbbb = yd = INFINITY

if b is multiplied by itself four times, it becomes d.

this means that in turn, b multiplied three times, would be bc.

also note that y times d is a number that represents infinity, and it stands to reason, now, that d must be infinity.



d! = ye

if d is multiplied by all of the lesser numbers that constitute infinity, e becomes the product.

this means that e is a biproduct of d that exceeds the limits of infinity.



ce = yg

if c is multiplied by e, a new product of g is formed.

this means that the original infinity of the formula above can be magnified to create numbers larger than infinity, still.

also note that c is not exactly half of infinity, but constitutes a midway mark in the progress to infinity.



de = ybe

if d is multiplied by e, be is the same.

this means that if attached to a y, the equation be is a larger number still, than infinity.

also note that y now appears to have a quantifiable value of more than infinity





a + b + d

bc

                       = yfx

b + cdg

with the last equations, we can find that f is the function of this equation that represents the common utility between all of the algebraic numbers.

if y is multiplied by the f of x, two seperate equations occur at the same time that are equal to each other.

therefore, a plus b plus d, divided by the product of b and c, is equal to the product of c, d, and g, added to b.





x = g = cddd = y = fx

             a

with the last equations, we can also set f of x as equal to y, g, x, and the product of c and three d’s, divided by a.

with this knowledge, we can see that whatever function is common, has the ability to multiply x to not only the original x, which had a multiplicative value with y as zero, but y itself as well, which had a value greater than infinity.

this means that y, x, and g, are all by themselves, greater than infinity.

also note that the quantities of the greater infinity of x, y, and g, although the same, would be under different sets of rules for use under the function, in that their qualities of determination are separate.

note as well, that the multiplicative value of c, d, d, and d, when divided by a, is equal to this greater infinity.













here we see the disintegration of the original equations.

try to untangle the following programs of numbers and come up with numerical values and qualities.

Total Proof



0 = y = g = x = yx = 0

ya = abbb = a + x

yb = bbb = bb = be = a + a = y

yc = bc = bb

x = g = y = be = bbbb = d = 16

g = ye = d!

g = yg = be = e = d = x = 2

ybe = bbbb = de

0 = x = f = y = 0

0 = be = f = d = 0

a + b + d

bc

                 = yfx

b + cdg

ce = yg

yg = e

c

ye = d! = i

c      c



y = d = be = x = cddd = g = fx

                             a

ii = x + ae = ce = 2

       dddd      d

                                             

abe  = x + ae

tyrc     dddd   = ashes = 1 = f





fy = ∞



hint:  the qualities of the numbers are just as important in resolution of infinity as their numerical value.



the following guidelines are based on the above equations.



Concerning Numbers And Their Uses





The Non-Existent Line
0 1 2



The Optimum Interceptor
1



The Infinite Line
1 16





































Hidden Properties Of 0

0 as half infinity multiplied by three multiple infinites, all divided by an eighth infinity
0 as half infinity multiplied by a retracting infinity
0 quarters out infinities, multiplied by a retracting infinity



Known Properties Of 0

0 multiplied by numbers always equals 0





Property Destruction Element Of 0



All imaginary and real numbers are not real, because of the Hidden Properties

The Curious Property Of 8

8 is the only number that is an exception to the Hidden Properties of 0.

However, noting that 8 in the case of numeric value is half of an infinity brings about significant notions of reality.

We can now safely assume that half infinity contains properties of its own that out-step the boundaries of optimal value.





ce = yg

yg = e

c



ye = d! = i

c      c



g = ce

y = be

yg = e

y = d

yg = bce

yg = bce = be

c       c



ye = bcce = be = bc

c       c          c



















As the rate of progress leans more and more on our natural resources, and continuously eats away at an already dwindling supply, the threat of an overlap in the ratio of science to supply increases daily.  With this in mind, and the facts in place that we will soon be faced with an industrial collapse, what will be the destiny of humanity?

With this short exploratory essay, I will abide by the notions that superstitions are unfactual.  In this way, I hope I avoid offending people with certain beliefs, and only slander at the devotion of faith as an activity of the modern human, no more, no less.  In other words, the beliefs of religious faiths is not what concerns me, but their operations do.

The immediate end of civilization is imminent, yet we still have yet to make the drastic alterations to daily life that would deter the situation.  Some in the past have committed to themselves that we will suffer global warming long before we actually run out of natural resources, yet i propose that based off of common knowledge, that global warming is already taking it's turns on the world ecosystem, that it will be long and far off that global warming's threat causes damage that would be dangerous to human existence.  Instead, i think that it seems far more likely that we will create a new social structure that adheres more ideally to the laws of a dog eat dog world.

In the future, what awaits humanity?  The clash of the major religions has been set in time, with only a change of face in the persecuted.  Where Adolf Hitler began on Judaism, it seems as though America has picked right up where he left off with Islam.  The only religion yet to see serious installment of holocaust is Christianity, but this has little to do with what comes next.  If anything, Islam, with it's vast control over natural resources, stands to gain power within the short remaining hours of humanity's symbiotic relationship with natural resources.  However, as we know from our conquest of the Middle East, Islam has little to do with actual government of it's people, rather it is dependent on religion for it's law.

With this information, the question is simple, what will be the use of religion in a 'post-apocalyptic' world that seems so close to unfolding?  The final stages of war will be crucial in deciding this change in socialized civilization.

It is unarguably noticeable that religion, itself, is a useless organization.  None of the benefits of organized religion make any sense, with the knowledge that any other organization of non-profit origins could make the same benefits with less grafting of it's constituents.  Can anyone make an argument for religion in a world where luxury is a foreign concept, solely based off the idea that religion has singular positive effects on an individual?

I would also hesitate to agree that many of religion's positive effects, if not all, are to strengthen the individual.  Muslims, for example, would look at the positive effects of kamikaze activists as solely representing their religion.  Christian donations, which seem like a good tax-deductible positive influence, do no more than help pay the clergy and a limited amount of church-going activities, in a grand outlook.  When was the last time you heard of either religion donating back in abundant amounts to fight poverty onwards?  Soup kitchens and food pantries aside, little is done by any monotheistic religion to combat the impoverished worldwide.  If there was an honest effort, we'd see results.  We haven't, in any sort of meaningful way.

Of course, these are more commentaries on monotheistic religions.  However, as it is obvious that other religions exist to attempt to aid the human spirit, a question remains of wherein lies the boundary between god and man?  Polytheistic religions, seem to definitely encompass a greater compassion for the individual, based on the acceptance that the individual is merely a portion of his/her existence.  Can the same be said for monotheism?  Quite possibly, yet the deitism inherent in the structures of most monotheism can lead to an outbalance of worship.  It is a concern, that by the bi-polar worshipping of first god, than oneself, than vice versa, in modern monotheism, that worship only leads to confusion when tangled up with the existence of secondary deities.  Christianity, with contrite seclusion of Jesus Christ, yet preachings by numerous people, Islam with Mohammed, and Judaism with texts and others.  Where polytheism strays from the beaten path isn't necessarily in it's separation of different gods, but actually it's inclusion of irregular deitism.  By irregular deitism, i mean that by one, man is not alone on Earth, and by two, man alone is balanced, yet not equal, with his counterparts in his/her world.

I foresee the world's apocalypse as being, therefore, very different than that of biblical terms.  Rather, I think of the future as being one of a new symbiotic relationship, aside from the lost resource of fuel, with the government and religious constructs that will become new on Earth.  Probably, we will lose all monotheistic faiths, in the next century, is my proposal.

A better religion is not in question here.  Any type of archetypical religion is flawed by the individual, and no great truth will ever be enough to sustain faith forever.  But, with the collapse of industry so close, my question is what will life be like reverting back to simpler times of theism?

What does everyone else believe?















































TOP OPERATIONAL PERSONALITY TEST





Welcome Ladies and Gents of all ages.

Come watch as I wandered into the game much to be stunned, and less to be amazed.

I chose, of course, as we all know... Wrong is right, and wrong is right but right is wrong, and right is wrong.
Quite a quandary.

It was false but that's alright, we'll explain more why I got stuck later...


here
I wrote a book about the mind and how it works, such things that bother me, and poetry. If it was environmental concerns we were all embarrassed about, I said to me, why don't we all go out and get a job on Mars. Like a hoodlum misspelling isotope, i wandered in the wrong room with the wrong tools for the wrong idea.
I'd like to call the book a quarry, but that worsens the matter a bit too much.


Anywho, I was the Perspectivist, and immediately called myself a Liar, unwittingly giving in to the last stand on human soul imaginable.
You see, we all come from a world, and the world is imagination. That's a word that'll stick to you whether you want it to or not.


I immediately weighted my options. I think I chose Informationist, but that's where this gets a little sloppy. I won to lose.
The book came out alright, if that's what you want to know. But not until I was done being a Mathematician which might not yet have happened to this day.


The word world comes to mind today, and it'll be seconds away from doom that i'll forget it existed.


I guess I'm the Fool afterall.

Anyways, here's the test...

Relations Within

Be not afraid…  If it is answers you seek, only questions will be answers, and answers will follow before the hindsight is…

The relations of the soul are not of the mind.  The bodily relations are ships and vessels of scientific knowledge.  Relations of the mind are of Personalities which may appear and disappear as all other relations.  The soul’s relation is to the person a hidden experience.

You will never truly understand or overstand or stand between your relation with your soul.  But if falsity must be claimed it must be in letting Proof’s be denied.  You will never be held in faith for telling your soul’s power, if not because of your naivety, it will be only because they cannot see your own through theirs.

What follows is a few outlines for how to know the soul of another, and whether to keep them distant or to bond.  The other option of course, is not to reveal anything you would like hidden, but this is not the case for the most of our humanity.  Nobody will be forsaken by everyone in time they will only know that there could be no answer that they could seek for themselves, nor question that they will be able to ask when the answer is available.  It is sad, yes, but in life we struggle, and love for all souls is the most of an objective that we will need.  Also, the most truthful is that all of these bonds of the soul should be kept.

This list is short.  But it is important to recede these into memory.

Heir – The one that shall never be seen

Foe – The one that shall be kept close

Kindred Spirit – The one that you shall be

Liar – The one that you shall be without

None will be One without all.  If you cannot change yourself, be only useful as you can to others that have vessels that you can help build.  This is the extension of authority through to personality as a Teacher.  But do not be reliant on such as these, for they are only tuitions or so to speak, for the most of them rely on what is known as the Intuition.

Love is the Hated Personality, and Hate is the lack of Association.

Brotherhood is of the Flawed Heir, the Sight of Parenthood.  This is the one thing that most will lack, is the idea of a Soul that has distinct boundaries amongst Brothers. If Parents are in question, then it is the duty of Authority to hand the Sight of Knowledge to Teachers.















With Relations

To continue your voyage, put your past in the present.  The exercise of the mind is a game of the future, and the test of present is to recognize your own self.

The followers of this book may take surprises, of course because I will be no superhero to explain my duty.

I will only lead the lost children to solve their problems with hope and faith that the future will shape back the future.

However, to symbolically recognize yourself, you will only need to read for interpretation.  Any other estimate should be made on your potential environment, and not on your past.

Reformation is needed in society.  This book may not solve all of the questions you pursue.  But it will indeed help the need for more answers to be questioned.

If without prioritizing the fundamentals of society, you are forced into an indecisive position, than work out your own angle and only heed the most important nature of man, to acquire an ultimate happiness.
















































1.)Why is the sky blue? Why is water wet?  (A-F scoring)


2.)Why did Judas rat to the Romans while Jesus slept? (A-F scoring)


Extra Credit: (Without a dictionary) Define Allomorph using only Morphemes. (F-A scoring)


3.) what is the answer to every question?
why is there a question?
what is the question?

why is what an answer?
what is the answer of why?
why not?

what is why?
what made it?

is it to be?
is it not?


bonus:

is how, who you are?
is when, where i am?


extra credit:

what came first, the chicken or the egg?

are you questioning your authority, or answering your faith?



(100% w/ incomplete scoring and bonus)

























8

Mind Game Series

Get a Chance…

Get a Pen…

Get a Clue…

Get to Writing…





Question One:

Why Not?





T                      F

are you not

a homie

?

¡






x____________________________________________





Question One:

Why Not?







Mind Games:  Personality Testing Made Easy




Instructions



Step One:  Do not ask for help until you are finished.

Step Two:  Answers to all questions need to be your own preference.  Choose and remember each answer without changing the question.

Step Three:  When you are finished with the questions, do not try to change your answers.

Step Four:  Use the key on the following pages to discover your personality.

Step Five:  Read your personality description.

Step Six:  Note your personality’s letter-number code.

Step Seven:  Use your personality’s letter-number code with the relationship list.

Step Eight:  Every letter match and number match is a relationship you should try to avoid.  Double matches for a relationship are optional.  Lack is what you need.  D is Destruction, or Destiny, or Deafness.

Step Nine:  Follow these directions with care.




Questions


Choose One To Remember Logically

I am right and you are right

I am right

Wrong is wrong

Wrong is right





Choose One Or The Other Illogically



Game or Test?



Wrong or Right?



Dark or Not Dark?





Relationships



1ab

someone who leads by example:  ie. does neither harm nor good:  ie.  your equal

Friend



1bb

anyone who, as your adversary, controls your ability to love

Family

1ba

everyone who benefits you by mutual choice

Associate



1bc

a familiar associate, not a friend

Loved One



2

someone who chooses to benefit you without any expectations

Mentor

1ac

people you no longer consider a friend

Enemy



3

power over people that you cannot control

Authority























Personality Key



Test – Informationist

c2



Game and Dark – Perspectivist

b2



Game, Wrong, and Not Dark – Religious

d3



Game, Right, and Not Dark – Maybe you quit

1

2



No Answer – Comedian

a1









































ILLOGIC



illogic is a subjective logical test.  it is dependent on condition, rather than compatability.  it is relatively easy to use, but hard to understand.





The Shared Equal Singular Universal Rights To Subversive Conjugate Wrong.



Universals are all only useable with the present and future noun.

Conjugations are only present for a future Universal, or future for a past or present Universal and are verbs or connective adjective.

Past Conjugations are always wrong when used more than once.

All Conjugations are a form of “to be”.

All Conjugations of “you” or form of “to not” are wrong.



To prove someone uses a Objective Conjugate Wrong, know that they possess two separate rights for each wrong or a larger ratio in that configuration. 

Two separate Singular Universals must be, then, Equal Conjugations to the Shared Right.  Subversive Conjugations to either, but not both, or neither Objective Universal Right, is therefore Wrong.

Equal Universal Conjugations begin with “I am” and end with a right.

Any statement of “I” is always right, unless followed to be proven wrong.



To Unusually Conjugate, a wrong and right must be separately used twice equally, or four rights must be used at the same time.



To prove someone is Subversively Conjugating Right, two separate rights and four separate wrongs, or four separate rights and eight separate wrongs, must be in use without Universal Equality.  The same effect would be made with the statement of one right and two separate wrongs.



Example Of Wrong

I am to not be.



Helpful Examples

Jesus is a dog.

Life and death is perfect.



Question:  Wrong or Right

Everything Was.

Bunnies and Gameboys are Playboys.

Wrong is right.





The following is an excerpt of the book Sol Air Y Caedo CE, as has been many of my postings...  This individual selection primarily centers on the validity of any logical statement.



As all of us whom are fluent in the language of mathematics know, the set rules of logic are with a definite and certain flaw as to the purpose of interpretation of right and wrong.

The idea of logic in mathematics is to determine the possibilities of an outcome of a statement, and to judge the truth or falseness of it.  This merely determines the ability of the statement to exist logically, yet does not help in considering whether it should exist naturally.



Illogic's idea was to accumulate the true statements of logic, and assign them rightness or wrongness.



Whether the current version available for mass market in copyrighten form is interpretable is a question I hope to resolve with this article.







Sol Y Air Be Caedo CE (pg 66) Copyrighten by Twyll The ChyllTyrant



ILLOGIC

illogic is a subjective logical test.  it is dependent on condition, rather than compatability.  it is relatively easy to use, but hard to understand.


The Shared Equal Singular Universal Rights To Subversive Conjugate Wrong.

Universals are all only useable with the present and future noun.
Conjugations are only present for a future Universal, or future for a past or present Universal and are verbs or connective adjective.
Past Conjugations are always wrong when used more than once.
All Conjugations are a form of “to be”.
All Conjugations of “you” or form of “to not” are wrong.

To prove someone uses a Objective Conjugate Wrong, know that they possess two separate rights for each wrong or a larger ratio in that configuration. 
Two separate Singular Universals must be, then, Equal Conjugations to the Shared Right.  Subversive Conjugations to either, but not both, or neither Objective Universal Right, is therefore Wrong.
Equal Universal Conjugations begin with “I am” and end with a right.
Any statement of “I” is always right, unless followed to be proven wrong.

To Unusually Conjugate, a wrong and right must be separately used twice equally, or four rights must be used at the same time.

To prove someone is Subversively Conjugating Right, two separate rights and four separate wrongs, or four separate rights and eight separate wrongs, must be in use without Universal Equality.  The same effect would be made with the statement of one right and two separate wrongs.

Example Of Wrong
I am to not be.

Helpful Examples
Jesus is a dog.
Life and death is perfect.

Question:  Wrong or Right
Everything Was.
Bunnies and Gameboys are Playboys.
Wrong is right.





Interpretation 2008:

To understand the passage, we must first attempt to understand the terminology used throughout.  Emphasis should also be placed on the fact that the philosophical works created within were poetically expressed, and in such a way, difficult to tangibilize. 



The idea of a Universal, for instance, would refer to the unsaid being of witness to a statement.  The statement, in it's entirety is the construct of two people's cooperation in conversation.  Whether known by one and the other, the idea of the universal remains intact by necessity.  The statement made is an address to an addressee.



The Conjugation in reference in the article, is also not used in the conventional senses.  The implied Conjugation use in the article is actually the action commited in the statement.

As stated, the Conjugation is actually "in Illogic", a verb or adjective.  The rules for using the Conjugation are also extracted and implanted into the equation of Illogic.  Simple notice of the fact of the flexibility of the use of a Universal would lead to the understanding that we are talking about Logical statements.  Universal, as stated before, implies that the statement in question has been addressed, yet that the statement has been made logically, we can surely know that the statement is in reference to a physical manifestation outside or inside the creator of the statement.



For example...



"The tiger is cat and it is big"

(The Universal is the tiger, which is both Conjugatively (and subjectively) a cat and big, (depending on how small of a cat you are comparing, and considering that a cat is only a label attached to a specific organism that we know to be much more), therefore, this statement is proven right.)

"The tiger is a cat that is a cat"

(The repeated Conjugation reverts us to doubt the implication of the tiger being an exact essence of cat, if you will)

"The tiger is a cat that will be big"

(The implication of a future Conjugation makes the statement, once again, wrong, because of the fact that we do not know the future and cannot rightly determine how big the tiger will get, or if it will die, etc.)

"The tiger was a cat that was not big"

(The special clause of the word "not" is poetically used to ascribe the attribute of Rightness that must be inherent even in the most absurd of cases, for instance imagine that if we were referring to the cat being not big to a small child, we would be making a fool of ourselves.)





The next section tackles the idea that with such useful tools of subjective judgment, we can prove someone objectively wrong as well...  This section is pretty self-explanatory and only means to prove the fact that to be subjectively wrong enough times will ensure the complete wrongess of a Universal.



For example, these are all Objectively wrong...



"The dog i will buy tomorrow runs and runs."

"The dolphin doesn't swim, but it will."

(As you also notice, the two separate Universals are inherent in both statements.  The Objectively wrong part is that they two Universals, while may have been right in certain circumstances can no longer coexist as right when compounded together to make an argument.)



"Cereal does not fly, and it doesn't make you sick."

(The last example is where it gets tricky.  Only understand that although the statement sounds logically true, it is actually illogically false because if someone was for instance lactose intolerant, it would result in their sickness.)



(Therefore...

"I ate cheese"

"I will eat cheese"

"I am eating cheese"

all are not only right, but also almost certainly prove that the statement maker is not lactose intolerant)





The rest is pretty simplicistic calculations in the same area of determining the value of Objective Rightness a statement possesses.



This can all be very useful in debate, or argument, or even casual conversation to get the other person to either prove himself humiliatingly wrong, or to even make "lemons into lemonade", and take wrong statements and teach the right ways to make them.







Logic and Illogic can coexist, and do, in everyday language.  Mathematicians may scratch their head at it, as well an editor may snob his nose at the perpetuation of Logical formula.

However, to truly fulfill the potential of a conversation, a mastery of both formulae should be in effect.











if anyone has any questions and comments, don't be afraid to e-mail me at twill420tyrant@yahoo.com



PEACE







Universal Key

W = WU

RW = UR

R = RW











































































Mind Games:  Will Free No Fee Too Ill

Will You Be Free?   I suppose that is a question to ask none other than yourself.  Pleasing is not compassionate as it seems.
 








Freewill?                                                                                                                                     Freewill?

Step 1:  Recall your original Personality Test and write down your unused answer (remember).

Step 2:  Prove with logic.  (true or false)

Step 3:  Recall your original Personality Test description and find the appropriate Personality on the map above.

Step 4:  Move to a connected Personality.

Step 5:  Refer to the Answer Key and write the description.

Step 6:  Universalize with the Universal Key, note it.

Step 7:  Move again until all connected Personalities have been Universalized.

Step 8:  Relate with new additional Relationship Key.

Step 9:  More to come...



Answer Key

Informationist – You are right and I am right

c2

Perspectivist – I am right

b3

Religious – Wrong is wrong

ddd3

Maybe you quit – Player

112

Comedian – Right is wrong – 11a



Informationist:  W, T

Perspectivist:  R, T

Religious:  R, F

Player:  W, Imaginatory Example:  T or F

Comedian:  R, F



Universal Key

W = WU

RW = UR

R = RW



































Relationships

1ab

someone who leads by example:  ie. does neither harm nor good:  ie.  your equal

Friend



1bbb

anyone who, as your adversary, controls your ability to love

Family

1ba

everyone who benefits you by mutual choice

Associate



1bc

a familiar associate, not a friend

Loved One



22

someone who chooses to benefit you without any expectations

Mentor

1aacc

people you no longer consider a friend

Enemy



33d

power over people that you cannot control

Authority







One Match:  Want

Two Matches:  Option Needed

Three Matches:  Unwanted

Four Matches:  Nonexistent













Mind Games:  No Answers

(to every question)

Personality should only exist for you…

Write our first answer, and your recorded move in their full descriptive sentence.  Prove it with the Universal Key.

Keep it for later use, where it will be referred to as your Personal Proof.









































































Mind Games:  Universe

(call it corny, or try what made it)



Recall your Personal Proof, disregard any other Personality or Relationship left.



(Use the following answers and you will suffer.)





 FRW = WU = you win = False

 TRW = UW = you lose = True



 FWU = UR = mathematician = True

 TWU = RU = illogician = False



TUR = RW = writer = maybe you won’t lose

FUR = WR = poet = maybe you can’t quit





If you win, you don’t have to continue.

if you maybe won’t lose, is wrong equal to right?

if your true, find someone to argue this for.

if your false, find someone to argue against.

if you maybe can’t quit maybe you should play again.

if you lose, you don’t have to continue.





























Answers to 1, 2, and Extra Credit, are to be measured by degree of attempt.  one sentence is a c, two a b, three, an a.

The difference is added up between the first two and the second is reversely subtracted.  if no answer is given for the extra credit, it’s a 50.  for any answer that works, it’s a 75.  for any wrong answer, a 0 is added.





Answers to 5 are all wrong, and fail the examinee even if they “won” the test from regaining conformationist level of relationship analyzation.  secondary personalities are used if they failed the section 3.  Option of secondaries are only available for the winners of the test.  Anyone stays in conformation, but anyone over a 100 on the part 3 is given option of conformation.  Noncomformists are incompleters, 65-85 range.



grades to part 3’s sections are multiplied rather than added.  the sections are added.



always give one chance for movement in step 2 of the personality testing.



































































POLIgious





The most important movements in political power in history have been conservative.

Make the most of your votes.  Not most of your mind.



The importance of political election wasn’t lost if your ticket never made it through primary, but it was when you compromised thereon in.  Don’t compromise with uncertainty.

Religion and state’s separation is a farce.



Never trust another man before yourself, but trust in god above everything. 





































































(Twyll The ChyllTyrant gets offstage to a roar of applause)

INSIDE - DARKLIT

Tyrant emerges behind a curtain backstage, left side of screen.



Tyrant:            hi.  i'm tyrant and to me, making funky music is a must.



Tyrant walks to the backstage exit, passing in front of camera, for a closeup of the right side of face.



Tyrant:            i recently found out that if you have a

ukulalee or even a pair of morracas or some triangles maybe a fuckin electric guitar or some shit.  you can be someone like david bowie or 50 cents. 



Tyrant walks out the exit.



OUTSIDE - DAYLIGHT

Tyrant proceeds to walk down a short stair down a street.  Camera follows on right side.



(pause as he looks right at the screen)



Tyrant:            that means you got shot at, either from the back or front, and then the pictures were put on the cover of entertainment weekly, and you'll be famous.  and being famous automatically always almost usually means that you make a lot of dollars, which buy you new pants.  what's with these young men and pants these days?  it's like a i don't know...  something that i'd have to think more about.



Tyrant continues to walk down the sidewalk.  Speaking while walking.



Tyrant:            i do think that being a musician can be a great starting point for a narcotics career, too.  or if your a musician long enough you can even be an actor in your own commercial, that people will have to struggle to forget, or you can dance, for a lot of money, or you can die and everyone will make a big thing about it.  so take for instance the massive support shown off for sprite by the rap community.  nothing like fairy juice to quench your thirst if your a hardcore gangster.



(Camera switches angles to face out onto the street as he continues to walk and turns a block)





Tyrant:            but by no means do you have to be a hardcore gangster to rap.  you don't even have to SING to rap!  all you have to do is have a cool name, and then apply a few rhymes to a rhythm of any type.  in fact, being hardcore in rap is a good way to sign your death sentence.  take for example; big l, notorious b.i.g., big pun, and pimp c.  maybe 2pac, but i heard he did ballet.  anyways, most other rappers are pretty normal, pretty upright regular churchgoing good guys.  i think they get a bad rep, and its a shame.  why would jadakiss really kill anybody?  why is the black eyed peas and wyclef jean producing big hits these days?  is anybody thinking to themselves right now "where did those mid 90's hardcore gangsters go?"



(In front of restaurant)

Tyrant looks right at the camera.



Tyrant:            holla atcha neckbone.



INSIDE – WELL LIT



(Scene changes to him facing the camera across a table with coffee, no cream on both sides.)



Tyrant:            (laughing)-and then i got this one long joke...  the punchline is worth it.  have you lately considered the shape of affairs globally? well if not, i’ll be the first to explain to you that things are rounding up for us.  in fact, it’s known as an exponential factor of both people hating each other, and people getting some old time dead.  that’s cool, right?



Tyrant drinks the whole cup of coffee in one guzzle, throws a two dollar bill on the table and looks at his watch.



Tyrant:            more born, more dead...  right?



Tyrant then looks across the table, and throws another two dollar bill down, grabs the other cup and guzzles that one too.



Tyrant:            the answer is yes.  take my word on that, but we’ll talk more later. 



OUTSIDE – DAYLIGHT

(Scene changes to the inside of a bus.  Tyrant is seated, leaning an elbow on the seat in front of him, with headphones sitting on his head next to a man with a digital camera, who is filming him.  The camera is resting near the ground, slightly behind the two.)



Tyrant:            but the other retarded shit that stands

between us and the spinning pile of debris we find ourself standing on, is really gaining weight just as we are.  in fact, it’s known as a factor of fact.



fact is, the oxygen we breathe is in jeopardy.  if plants can’t sustain themselves as elements of life, on a planet gone beserk with environmental factors, we’re pretty much, like i said, dead.  and the way that chemical processes work, we’re in a deficit right now of weed.  as well as other proper elements of life.  the main, excuse me, man is the major producer of the shit.  like rappers, and stuff...  sorry, bad pun...  but don’t worry, i’m telling you, the punchline is worth it, though.



how are we forgetting the ozone, or the water?  well we’re forgetting them by taking them for granted.  but that’s obvious, we can’t even see ozone.  mama said what you can’t see don’t trust.  water is just that stuff down in toilets, and out giving our expensive car rust stains.  can’t be much important going on with that, except that there’s a lot more water than you think there is.  our bodies for instance, are made of water.  so are the ice caps.  when those free up, melt down, push off, and move on, not only will it create more surface area for water to heat up and evaporate, but it will also create a lower air temperature, possibly stirring up that next ice age we’ve all been waiting for. 

our water in our bodies, though, that has to be doing alright.  only, we’ve actually got a lot of that in our genes.  and what’s wrong with our genes, is the stuff that went wrong with the genetic line.  humans have never been known for what i call innertelligence.  actually, they’ve been rarely known for anything like wisdom which is only experiential data.  actually, let’s find out what the comparative iq’s of the average dolphin, and the average man, based on whose averages way out the most evenly.  so the dolphins can win everytime, without having even made the test?



well.  at least the punchline is worth it.  it’s worth it.  and here it is, if the end of the human ability to at our technological time adhere to the weight of the fragile existence that it extends itself unto, then may we commence the end of rap.



Tyrant abruptly stands in front of the man with the digital camera who folds it and puts it away, and walks down the aisle away from both cameras, and out the front of the bus, following several other young men.  At the last moment he turns back to the cameramen, and gives the screen a peace sign.



Tyrant:            PEACEKI WEEZ!























00                10  20                    100      200      300      400                             

01                1a  2a                    130      230      330      4d0

02                1b  2b                    160      260      360      4e0

03                1c  2c                    190      290      390      4f0





04                1d  2d                    220      320      420                                         

05                15  25                    250      350      450

06                16  26                    280      380      480





07                17  27                    310      410



08                18  28                    340      440







09                19  29                    370      470





10                20  30                    400

11                21  31                    430

12                22  32                    460



13                23  33                    490









g = infinity











(4f0.. 4f0.. 370.145... <===> 957.145...)

(4f0.. 440 x 09 <===> 7308)

(09 – 11 <===> -02)

















The body of Christ separated in two first and then three second.  The fourth will be always kept as the Lamb Of God to be repeated and completed.



The body of God too, is separated in the same way.



The other two separations are degenerations and generations of spirit.  Jeremiah the sword, and Joshua the heart.



The next separation will be for us to return to one from 3, the sun, moon, and earths.

This will happen at the station of a revolution around the sun from a separate longitude than possible at our Air.  Here we will inherit the ability to function as kindred spirits.  This will return to the cycle of souls, which stands to be the yet undefeated nature of Sapien and Man.

Our major loss will be of our children to the Authority.

Our minor loss will be of our freedom of loss.

Our gain will be forever again to be as the immortals once were.



Seriously, didn’t it get any easier?

For what lies ahead is the battleground of human spirit to be reopened.  The soul, it’s manifestation of infinite, and the mind, it’s reincarnation, and the heart, it’s mortal self will be forever intertwined with the love of our will and Elohim.





This Testament will be for others to Stand on, and see, as well as add to for Altitude.



Allow no computer generated logos to take from you the theories laid here as foundation for new fundamentals to be taken upon by the people that have inherited the space we call life.



Words Speak Louder Than Numbers Young Action.















































































01%20-%20Ehwaz
Tyr’s Fall by Twyll The ChyllTyrant

I’d die without you and that’s the only truth i know.

tonight on the eve of our rebirth, i make my sacrifice

so clear i stay with not a purpose of any type

the false dragons may snap but my brain will win back

scrap it...

no understanding between the monitor and the nursed

but what’s the worth of me if my being is cursed?

i wrote so many i’m sorries now...

that father has forgiven and forgot how at once...

but no apology was worth the certificate

and that certificate was greek

changes will be with us and that wasn’t

but minds are the eternal,

and our final strike...  how fruitless

for when the hour struck, now ruthless

my child may have been named

but your sake was not given

and the snake that beats the bush along i travel

will wind up

so one of us, maybe two, maybe three at once

but we’ll get there, and we know your name

enlighten one, but i dim your bare bones trilogy

and trinity is thine name, and enlighten too

but your defeat will not be at my hands or will

but with hands of an instrument i have

and what you know not, is that my judgment is passed

not graciously, and that the man in the monitor kills

you’ll never know how this starts or begins...

but i’ll hint to you,

it was long before you or eye, or i, me, myselfish wasted

some thank that our astrologists were 12 hours behind, and not 21 years old.

but my baby, she lied in her grave, and those were the greatest lies

05%20-%20arcstone